Inference vs Training Cost: Which One Is Actually Your Problem
Training is a one-off capital cost you never pay. Inference is a recurring cost you pay per request. How the two differ and why the distinction shapes pricing.
ReadPractical writing for developers building with large language models — how they work, how to pick one, and how to keep the bill predictable.
Training is a one-off capital cost you never pay. Inference is a recurring cost you pay per request. How the two differ and why the distinction shapes pricing.
ReadA pretrained model continues text; it does not answer questions. Instruction tuning is the small, cheap stage that turns one into the other.
ReadHow to run a model of your choosing inside IntelliJ, PyCharm or GoLand — what the bundled assistant will and will not do, and the plugin route that does.
ReadWhich JSON Schema features survive the trip to a model, why strict mode changes the rules, and how to write tool parameter schemas that validate and get used correctly.
ReadConfigure Kilo Code against your own OpenAI-compatible endpoint, set the model metadata it cannot infer, and assign different models per mode with profiles.
ReadMoonshot shipped K3 four months after K2.6, but the older model did not become useless. What K2.6 is, what it costs, and the jobs it is still the right pick for.
ReadTwo models released three days apart with opposite design goals. Active parameters, context length, licensing and vision decide which one fits your workload.
ReadK2.6 sees images at 256K context under a custom licence. V4 Pro is text-only, MIT, 1M context, and reasons harder. Two models that barely overlap.
ReadK2.6 sees images and stops at 256K context under a custom licence. GLM-5.2 is text-only, MIT, and takes 1M tokens. Two clean trade-offs, no overlap.
ReadBoth take images natively, but one gives you 256K of context at a known price and the other 1M at a price sources disagree on. How to pick between them.
ReadA trillion-parameter vision model you rent against a dense 27B you can own. The comparison is about deployment shape, not a few points of benchmark difference.
ReadThe strongest open-weight model against one of the cheapest, both with 1M context. When a twenty-fold price difference is worth paying and when it is waste.
ReadShowing 469–480 of 731 articles